Teach me about stitch markers
Saturday, November 11th, 2017 10:55 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I’ve been tasked with making some stitch markers, and I’m a knitting idiot.
7mm, 9mm, or larger rings? Closed loops? Hook like an earring but tighter? Small round clasp?
How simple should dangles be so they don’t catch in the work?
Can you point me to the ones you love? Warn me of the mistakes not to make?
(no subject)
Date: 2017-11-11 08:53 pm (UTC)I use 6mm rings for fine work, and 8mm rings for larger work -- they're much like tiny keychain rings (spiral, can be put on/off of the cable part of circular needles easily) -- and are both easy to detect in the flow of work, by hand, if not by eye, as well as not intrusive enough to cause gaps in the fabric from being in place.
I've also got a few colours of bulb pins, which are handy when you're trying to add a marker to the needle, rather than the cable (or when you're wanting to mark out a stitch further down).
It's probably worth noting that safety pins tend to be fail as markers, because it's so easy to get the yarn tangled up in the head end, or split, or both -- and that makes a mess of your project.
While I'm sure that some people like markers that can't be opened, I'm not one of them -- I'd need to reliably remember when to place markers (and not drop them), which just isn't going to happen. That said, an openable marker should be easy to open, and stay closed once it's in place (completely unlike a dungeon door) -- I wouldn't want to have markers that couldn't be opened/closed one-handed either, since needing both hands would lead to frequent dropping of stitches.
As far as dangles go, it's not so much needing to be simple, as needing to be smooth/non-catching -- a simple thing with sharp edges is way more problematic than a jangle of smooth beads. That said, I personally don't like them much, because I tend to use lightweight yarns, and they're often heavy enough to distort the knitting (which really just boils down to "pick appropriate weights").
Hopefully this helps a bit -- if there are parts that are unclear, confusing, or just "Huh, what?", feel free to elbow ;D
Very helpful!
Date: 2017-11-11 10:19 pm (UTC)FYI, "keychain rings" are called "split rings" in jewelry jargon.
*snort* re dungeon doors: Now I want to market a Goth-themed line of stitch markers with dungeon and ball & chain charms.
Speaking of findings ...
Date: 2017-11-17 02:36 pm (UTC)... and trying to find a picture actually led me to a suggestion to search on 'ball return cufflink finding', which took me to pasternakfindings.com and their unhelpfully named "18K Yellow Gold Cuff link- Pair" which look like they're pretty close to the right thing, although totally out of my price range, and still lacking any method other than trawling through pages of google images to try and find them :(
Re: Speaking of findings ...
Date: 2017-11-19 12:15 am (UTC)https://www.riogrande.com/category/chains-and-findings/silver/incidentals/cuff-links-and-tie-tacks
But you need a wholesale permit to buy there.
This seems like a perfect job for 3D printing, or barring that, precious metal clay.
(no subject)
Date: 2017-11-12 03:07 am (UTC)More data is always good
Date: 2017-11-12 03:43 pm (UTC)smooth, smooth, smooth
Date: 2017-11-12 03:25 am (UTC)My favorites have soft loops rather than rigid rings - tiger tail or elastic. My absolute favorites are these yarn balls. They show up against my work and my needles, they're perfectly smooth, and they work on every size of needle I own without disturbing the stitches.
Re: smooth, smooth, smooth
Date: 2017-11-12 03:45 pm (UTC)Re: smooth, smooth, smooth
Date: 2017-11-17 02:27 pm (UTC)Re: smooth, smooth, smooth
Date: 2017-11-17 04:55 pm (UTC)Re: smooth, smooth, smooth
Date: 2017-11-20 12:56 pm (UTC)