jesse_the_k: Slings & Arrows' Anna says: "I'll smack you so hard your cousin will fall down!" (Anna smacks hard)
[personal profile] jesse_the_k
[personal profile] liv recently hosted a thoughtful discussion on “Bullying for Social Justice”

https://liv.dreamwidth.org/539260.html

“Call-out culture,” like “political correctness,” sounds neutral while carrying conflicting ideological meaning.

Laurie Penny addresses some of these issues in "Who Does She Think She Is: The internet does not hate women. People hate women, and the internet allows them to do it faster, harder, and with impunity."

https://longreads.com/2018/03/28/who-does-she-think-she-is

It took me many years to learn the most important distinguishing factor when trying to decide what criticism to take on board, once you’ve filtered and blocked for bots and fascists. It’s not about tone, and it’s not, for fuck’s sake, about Twitter. It’s about pleasure. Is somebody actively enjoying making you feel like shit? Is driving conscientious people to mental breakdown a really good time for them? Are they getting off on your pain? There’s a word for that, and it’s not “ally.” I understand that bullying can feel pretty damn good, especially if you don’t call it that. I understand that playing the game of trashing feels comfortable and comprehensible, even righteous, when so little else does. But I’ve read all the theory and staggered through all the flame wars and I’ve come to the conclusion that when you get down to it, people who enjoy hurting other people are not worth your time or mine. They can take that kink to a club where it belongs.

When I was young and energetic, we discussed this in the context of Jo Freeman’s 1976 article about “TRASHING: The Dark Side of Sisterhood”

What is “trashing,” this colloquial term that expresses so much, yet explains so little? It is not disagreement; it is not conflict; it is not opposition. These are perfectly ordinary phenomena which, when engaged in mutually, honestly, and not excessively, are necessary to keep an organism or organization healthy and active. Trashing is a particularly vicious form of character assassination which amounts to psychological rape. It is manipulative, dishonest, and excessive. It is occasionally disguised by the rhetoric of honest conflict, or covered up by denying that any disapproval exists at all. But it is not done to expose disagreements or resolve differences. It is done to disparage and destroy.

And yet I still got involved in a Maoist communist group, than whom there are no more expert trashers. I wish I had a handy moral to this story.

Can you point me to works where people went from trashing to actual discussion, listening and responding to what people actually say.

⇾1

(no subject)

Date: 20/04/2018 08:49 am (UTC)
oursin: George Beresford photograph of the young Rebecca West in a large hat, overwritten 'Neither a doormat nor a prostitute' (Neither a doormat nor a prostitute)
From: [personal profile] oursin
Alas, I can't. But I can wonder whether Joanna Russ on Power and Helplessness in the Women's Movement was describing a dynamic that is, perhaps, still relevant. Depressing though that thought is.

Though, thinking of Russ, I have been cheered this week at the news that Suppressing Women's Writing is, finally, back in print!
⇾2

(no subject)

Date: 20/04/2018 03:43 pm (UTC)
owlectomy: A squashed panda sewing a squashed panda (Default)
From: [personal profile] owlectomy
Yes - I first read "Magic Mommas, Trembling Sisters, Puritans and Perverts" a couple of years ago, and so much of it made me think "Holy crap, that's exactly the same thing that happened wrt such-and-such Tumblr flamewar!"
⇾1

(no subject)

Date: 20/04/2018 11:38 am (UTC)
luzula: a Luzula pilosa, or hairy wood-rush (Default)
From: [personal profile] luzula
Can you point me to works where people went from trashing to actual discussion, listening and responding to what people actually say.

Yes, I can! The dialogue between Murray Bookchin and Dave Foreman in Defending the Earth, from 1990. I don't know about trashing exactly, but there was a rather infected debate where social ecologists criticized misanthropy in the deep ecology movement. And leaders in each movement came together for a dialogue, where they did actually listen and respond to each other. I don't know that it solved the rift between the movements, but it's definitely an interesting book.

And thanks for the interesting links. I stay off social media in my political work--I feel much better having actual meetings and doing things together in meatspace. I mean, obviously there can be negative group dynamics without the internet as well (as provided by your references in the post), but there's still an awful lot of shit that you avoid by staying off social media. I'm aware that it's a trade-off and that I miss things by not being on Facebook etc, but for me it's an easy choice to make.

ETA: Obviously I do use the non-social media aspects of the internet. Email FTW!
Edited Date: 20/04/2018 11:40 am (UTC)
⇾3

Re: Thanks for the rec!

Date: 21/04/2018 08:13 pm (UTC)
luzula: a Luzula pilosa, or hairy wood-rush (Default)
From: [personal profile] luzula
Oh hey, I didn't know it was on the Anarchist Library! But I'm not sorry I got a paper copy.
⇾1

(no subject)

Date: 21/04/2018 05:56 pm (UTC)
magnetic_pole: (Default)
From: [personal profile] magnetic_pole
Thanks for these links! I'm a little too tired to leave a proper comment, but I'm always interested in this aspect of fandom culture and have made some bookmarks for later.

Even just seeing Joanna Russ' name here in the comments warmed my heart a little. :) J.

Popular Tags

April 2026

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Style Credit

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated Thursday, 2 April 2026 07:39 am