Hearken! Bits and bobs with a D/deaf theme
Monday, March 30th, 2015 08:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've been reading all of a wonderful blog from Mel Chua, who is too many things to summarize, but in her own words, "a human jumper cable." If you work with, teach, learn, or hang around any number of deaf people, please read this
Being deaf is: holding a hidden, uncollapsed wave function on your side of a conversation at all times.
Expanding to "studying while disabled", Mel addresses How to succeed in engineering school as a disabled person in a poem
In ADA enforcement* news, the National Association of the Deaf has sued Harvard and MIT, complaining they've systematically excluded deaf learners from their edX online courses because they have no captions or really inaccurate captions. Go NAD! Their successful suit against Netflix is why almost everything at Netflix is captioned now (although the quality is not particularly impressive). I'm eager to see how the courts address the "close enough is good enough" standard that many captioning agencies adhere to.
For media studies types:
You may thank me for omitting scores of articles which assume captioning would be too expensive (thus breeding hundreds of comments that disabled people cost too much given our worth). I've never seen public reports of what captioning costs, and particularly no reporting on the topic in this context.
I say: GO NAD! Pump my fist again and again.
* Why is a lawsuit "enforcement"? Because the vast majority of Americans with Disabilities Act rights are gained not from the law itself, but by someone suing to claim those rights have been violated. Sometimes, the U.S. (Federal) Department of Justice has worked with individuals and classes to bring suits, and only then do Federal lawyers advocate for disability rights. There is no "ADA Police" because violating our rights isn't a crime.
Being deaf is: holding a hidden, uncollapsed wave function on your side of a conversation at all times.
begin quote
I hear fuzzy blobs of intonation, accented by body language; I turn it into English somewhere in my mind, "constantly translating every line of language into itself," as Josh Swiller says in Andrew Solomon's book Far From The Tree. When I hear a word-like sound, multiple options for "what word could that be?" spring into my mind with equal probability. As fuzzy-wordlike-sound probability trees pile up, sentence-like shapes begin to form and snap into clarity in bits and pieces. That cognitive effort happens for every sentence of every conversation that shapes my job, my studies, my relationships, my ability to order pizza, stay informed of gate changes for my flight, or leave a building in emergencies.
I used to pride myself on being a risk-taker, good at uncertainty. In actuality, I am terrible at uncertainty. What I am good at is turning uncertainty into certainty — bounding and quantifying fuzziness, slapping error bars on everything. The moment something crosses my Line of Maximum Uncertainty — the point at which I can no longer bound that uncertainty into certainty — I snap into a grumpy monster who resolves things into black-and-white too soon, because holding uncertainty is hard, and I am very, very tired.
end quote
Expanding to "studying while disabled", Mel addresses How to succeed in engineering school as a disabled person in a poem
begin quote
Don't get angry.
Don't have feelings.
Don't realize how tired you are.
Don't realize that what you're doing is extra labor.
Stay oblivious. Focus on your classwork.
Don't ask for help.
Don't look dumb.
And never show signs that you're struggling.
That any of this is any harder for you.
That any of this ever hard for you.
end quote
In ADA enforcement* news, the National Association of the Deaf has sued Harvard and MIT, complaining they've systematically excluded deaf learners from their edX online courses because they have no captions or really inaccurate captions. Go NAD! Their successful suit against Netflix is why almost everything at Netflix is captioned now (although the quality is not particularly impressive). I'm eager to see how the courts address the "close enough is good enough" standard that many captioning agencies adhere to.
For media studies types:
- NAD's press release about their suit, provided in English and as ASL Flash videos, with copious examples and transcripts for the ASL-impaired.
- The suit as reported in the New York Times on February 13th, 2015
- When the left hand doesn't fund the right hand: MIT user experience gurus provide references on how to do captioning correctly
- Even the comments on the Chronicle of Higher Education (trade journal for colleges & universities) require major tranquilizers to read.
You may thank me for omitting scores of articles which assume captioning would be too expensive (thus breeding hundreds of comments that disabled people cost too much given our worth). I've never seen public reports of what captioning costs, and particularly no reporting on the topic in this context.
I say: GO NAD! Pump my fist again and again.
* Why is a lawsuit "enforcement"? Because the vast majority of Americans with Disabilities Act rights are gained not from the law itself, but by someone suing to claim those rights have been violated. Sometimes, the U.S. (Federal) Department of Justice has worked with individuals and classes to bring suits, and only then do Federal lawyers advocate for disability rights. There is no "ADA Police" because violating our rights isn't a crime.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-03-31 02:23 am (UTC)fast speech
heavily accented speech
speech + music
speech with background noise
all make me reach for the subtitles button...
For that matter, BBC iplayer has captioning, yay - and it seems to be v accurate, at least on Wolf Hall.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-03-31 03:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-03-31 03:54 am (UTC)Now I am going to actually read everything!
(no subject)
Date: 2015-03-31 06:47 pm (UTC)